Presumption and you may Evaluation out of Wife or husband’s Filial Piety Level

Hooper D., Coughlan J., Mullen M. (2008). Architectural picture modelling: guidelines to own choosing design fit Mazedonisch Frauen aus. Electron. J. Bus. Res. Procedures six 53–60. [Google Scholar] Huston T. L. (2000). Brand new societal environment regarding . 62 298–319. /j.1741-8.x [CrossRef] [Yahoo Scholar] Jiang J., Gong Y. (2015). Unmarried male’s partner preference browse: prefered characteristics and influence points[Into the Chinese]. Young people Stud. 38 58–65. [Yahoo Pupil] Khazan We., McHale J. P., ). Violated wishes about office regarding childcare labor anticipate early coparenting techniques throughout the exhausting and you can nonstressful friends product reviews. Newborn Ment. Health J. 29 343–361. /imhj.20183 [PMC free blog post] [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Bing Beginner] Li H., Chen Q. (2001). Normative studies of the Chinese Ohio marital fulfillment scale: findings centered on Hong-kong and you may Beijing products [inside the Chinese]. Psychol. Dev. Educ. 18 82–85. /j.issn.1001-.017 [CrossRef] [Yahoo College student] Liu A beneficial., Tong X. (2014). The current disease out-of gender perceptions plus the factors impacting them: in accordance with the 3rd survey out of ladies’ social standing within the Asia [Inside Chinese]. Soc. Sci. China thirty five 116–129. [Google Scholar] Liu J., Wang Y., Jackson T. (2017). Toward detailing matchmaking disappointment from inside the Chinese relationship people: relationships disillusionment, emerging worry, otherwise insecure connection build? Pers. Individ. Differ. 112 42–forty-eight. /j.paid back. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar] Milardo R. Meters., Helms-Erikson H. (2000). “ System overlap and you can third-party dictate inside intimate dating ,” into the Personal Relationships: A Sourcebook , eds Hendrick C., Hendrick S. (Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; ), 33–forty-five. [Yahoo Student] Qiu J. (2015). […]